<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Batman George W. Bush?</title>
	<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598</link>
	<description>a conservative look at film, punk</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive &#187; Is &#8220;W&#8221; the Signal for &#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-27880</link>
		<author>Flopping Aces » Blog Archive &#187; Is &#8220;W&#8221; the Signal for &#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221;?</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-27880</guid>
		<description>[...] Dirty Harry&#8217;s Place also notes another article that sees The Joker as a super-terrorist: In Variety’s mostly positive but less than rave over Dark Knight, this stood out: Pic shrewdly positions the Joker as the superhero-movie equivalent of a modern terrorist (one of several post-9/11 signifiers), who threatens to target Gotham civilians until Batman reveals his identity. Batman, Gordon and Dent uneasily join forces, but the Joker seems to have the upper hand at every step, even from a jail cell; the city, turning against the hero it once looked to for hope, seems more fractious, vulnerable and dangerous than ever. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dirty Harry&#8217;s Place also notes another article that sees The Joker as a super-terrorist: In Variety’s mostly positive but less than rave over Dark Knight, this stood out: Pic shrewdly positions the Joker as the superhero-movie equivalent of a modern terrorist (one of several post-9/11 signifiers), who threatens to target Gotham civilians until Batman reveals his identity. Batman, Gordon and Dent uneasily join forces, but the Joker seems to have the upper hand at every step, even from a jail cell; the city, turning against the hero it once looked to for hope, seems more fractious, vulnerable and dangerous than ever. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-19711</link>
		<author>Stephanie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-19711</guid>
		<description>Wow another leftwing loser found his way here. Donnie I can call you Donnie..if you want to make points make a good arguement. Your just spreading hate filled Daily Kos graffiti. And unless your a 14 year old street urchin from east LA it doesn't become you. Grow the F up little man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow another leftwing loser found his way here. Donnie I can call you Donnie..if you want to make points make a good arguement. Your just spreading hate filled Daily Kos graffiti. And unless your a 14 year old street urchin from east LA it doesn&#8217;t become you. Grow the F up little man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-19704</link>
		<author>Don</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-19704</guid>
		<description>Batman is not a "right-winger" or a "left-winger." Do you think a masked vigilante tormented by the death of his parents and the destruction of his city would have some flimsy political alliance? Also, Batman is not George Bush you fucking degenerate mongloids. When Batman wages a war he actually fights in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Batman is not a &#8220;right-winger&#8221; or a &#8220;left-winger.&#8221; Do you think a masked vigilante tormented by the death of his parents and the destruction of his city would have some flimsy political alliance? Also, Batman is not George Bush you fucking degenerate mongloids. When Batman wages a war he actually fights in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-16143</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-16143</guid>
		<description>You are all absolutely right, I thought this the moment I left the theatre, only just now got around to googling for a like-minded analysis of the movie. 


BUT the far, FAR more important thing here is not what the movie is saying, but the audience's reaction!

What percentage of Americans do you think left the movie theatre disgusted with Batman's morality? 

I'll give you a hint: the figure is microscopic in comparison to how many disapprove of Bush's morality. microscopic.

We must use this---I already used it on a liberal friend of mine and after they admit they like Batman's morals they have no argument against the basic ideas the war is based on.

I believe this is not only a great film, it has the ability to open minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all absolutely right, I thought this the moment I left the theatre, only just now got around to googling for a like-minded analysis of the movie. </p>
<p>BUT the far, FAR more important thing here is not what the movie is saying, but the audience&#8217;s reaction!</p>
<p>What percentage of Americans do you think left the movie theatre disgusted with Batman&#8217;s morality? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a hint: the figure is microscopic in comparison to how many disapprove of Bush&#8217;s morality. microscopic.</p>
<p>We must use this&#8212;I already used it on a liberal friend of mine and after they admit they like Batman&#8217;s morals they have no argument against the basic ideas the war is based on.</p>
<p>I believe this is not only a great film, it has the ability to open minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hector garza</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-15712</link>
		<author>hector garza</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-15712</guid>
		<description>"JohnLocke," it's tough to understand how you reconcile your neocon worldview with that of an enlightened individual such as your ineptly chosen namesake.  Are you serious with the cr*p you post?  Or are you a closet-liberal engaged in some covert campaign to discredit actual conservatives by posting retarded comments while posing as one?

"By 1998, we had a concrete list of WMDs that the Iraqi government admitted to producing, weapons that Iraq was not allowed to produce. Forget CIA speculation."

Are you able to even follow the debate surrounding 9/11?  You sound like you're information is limited to a small but distrubed community of ultra right-wing conspiracy theorists.  What was the actual, recent and cogent intelligence about WMD immediately prior to our intervention?  If you were capable of following the conversation you'd understand this was the proper point to address.

It's poorly thought out individuals such as yourself that give actual conservatives a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;JohnLocke,&#8221; it&#8217;s tough to understand how you reconcile your neocon worldview with that of an enlightened individual such as your ineptly chosen namesake.  Are you serious with the cr*p you post?  Or are you a closet-liberal engaged in some covert campaign to discredit actual conservatives by posting retarded comments while posing as one?</p>
<p>&#8220;By 1998, we had a concrete list of WMDs that the Iraqi government admitted to producing, weapons that Iraq was not allowed to produce. Forget CIA speculation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you able to even follow the debate surrounding 9/11?  You sound like you&#8217;re information is limited to a small but distrubed community of ultra right-wing conspiracy theorists.  What was the actual, recent and cogent intelligence about WMD immediately prior to our intervention?  If you were capable of following the conversation you&#8217;d understand this was the proper point to address.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s poorly thought out individuals such as yourself that give actual conservatives a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thecobrasnose</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-11115</link>
		<author>thecobrasnose</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-11115</guid>
		<description>Batman Begins is a neo-con movie, all about the struggle to practice the responsible use of tremendous power and wealth in a chaotic world.  In the movie, the villains are explicitly fanatics who want to turn back time and technology through terrorism.  The hero is the misunderestimated playboy goof who realizes good intentions are not sufficient:  "It's not who I am underneath, but what I *do* that defines me."  In this, he rejects the ethos of his limousine liberal parents (murdered before his eyes, due in part to their limp reaction to street crime) and returns to his ancestral politics and ideals.  The association with northern industries and the underground railroad strongly hint these were Republican.  

I thought it odd that most of the cast were English or European.  Did Nolan think an American cast would pick up on the analogy and rebel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Batman Begins is a neo-con movie, all about the struggle to practice the responsible use of tremendous power and wealth in a chaotic world.  In the movie, the villains are explicitly fanatics who want to turn back time and technology through terrorism.  The hero is the misunderestimated playboy goof who realizes good intentions are not sufficient:  &#8220;It&#8217;s not who I am underneath, but what I *do* that defines me.&#8221;  In this, he rejects the ethos of his limousine liberal parents (murdered before his eyes, due in part to their limp reaction to street crime) and returns to his ancestral politics and ideals.  The association with northern industries and the underground railroad strongly hint these were Republican.  </p>
<p>I thought it odd that most of the cast were English or European.  Did Nolan think an American cast would pick up on the analogy and rebel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnLocke</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-10438</link>
		<author>JohnLocke</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-10438</guid>
		<description>"Where is the proof that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? Did we not indeed invade a sovereign nation based on bad evidence?"

Oh, so we had no right to invade a nation that admitted to being in possession of or producing thousands of weapons and weapons agents that were in violation of the Gulf War ceasefire? We had no right to invade a nation that refused to comply with U.N. resolutions time after time after time? We had no right to invade a nation that provided funding and shelter to terrorists and terrorist groups, including one of the masterminds behind the 1993 WTC bombings? Don't give me this "bad evidence" nonsense. By 1998, we had a concrete list of WMDs that the Iraqi government admitted to producing, weapons that Iraq was not allowed to produce. Forget CIA speculation. Forget the intelligence reports. This was stuff Iraq ADMITTED to having. And Iraq not only failed to provide credible evidence that these weapons had been destroyed, but also actively worked to hinder U.N. investigations. 

"Did not the government hire contract killers (Blackwater) who took out 17 unarmed civilians, and at least 14 of them had no reason to die (many of whom were women and children)?"

Private contractor guards who happened to be under government contract went a little nuts and killed civilians? Oh, that evil George Bush! Shit happens in war, Chris. Yes, that was a terrible incident. But do you really think innocent people never got shot without cause by the Allies during World War II? You cannot judge a war or the Commander and Chief executing the war based on the renegade actions of a few Blackwater guards. Bush did not "target civilians."

"Has not the Bush administration used torture methods on persons that might not be terrorists at all?"

The definition of torture is subject to debate, and if a person is in government custody, I think it's fair to assume that he is being held for a reason. 

"Batman would get his facts straight, do the proper investigation, not go after anyone who wasn’t involved, certainly not target civilians, and he wouldn’t use torture on anyone that he didn’t know for certain was involved in the crime going on in Gotham City. He also leaves Metropolis alone because those criminals don’t have anything to do with the crime in Gotham."

Well, you certainly deflated Harry's comparison there. Nevermind the fact that you're being glib and even downright disingenuous when it comes to Bush's handling of the war, as I proved above. But hey, while you're at it, why don't you bring up the fact that Batman doesn't have a southern accent? And hey, isn't Bush just a little bit older than Batman?

Give me a break. Harry was making a generalized comparison. Sure, if you zoom far enough in, you're gonna find discrepancies. Hey, no allegory is perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Where is the proof that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? Did we not indeed invade a sovereign nation based on bad evidence?&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, so we had no right to invade a nation that admitted to being in possession of or producing thousands of weapons and weapons agents that were in violation of the Gulf War ceasefire? We had no right to invade a nation that refused to comply with U.N. resolutions time after time after time? We had no right to invade a nation that provided funding and shelter to terrorists and terrorist groups, including one of the masterminds behind the 1993 WTC bombings? Don&#8217;t give me this &#8220;bad evidence&#8221; nonsense. By 1998, we had a concrete list of WMDs that the Iraqi government admitted to producing, weapons that Iraq was not allowed to produce. Forget CIA speculation. Forget the intelligence reports. This was stuff Iraq ADMITTED to having. And Iraq not only failed to provide credible evidence that these weapons had been destroyed, but also actively worked to hinder U.N. investigations. </p>
<p>&#8220;Did not the government hire contract killers (Blackwater) who took out 17 unarmed civilians, and at least 14 of them had no reason to die (many of whom were women and children)?&#8221;</p>
<p>Private contractor guards who happened to be under government contract went a little nuts and killed civilians? Oh, that evil George Bush! Shit happens in war, Chris. Yes, that was a terrible incident. But do you really think innocent people never got shot without cause by the Allies during World War II? You cannot judge a war or the Commander and Chief executing the war based on the renegade actions of a few Blackwater guards. Bush did not &#8220;target civilians.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Has not the Bush administration used torture methods on persons that might not be terrorists at all?&#8221;</p>
<p>The definition of torture is subject to debate, and if a person is in government custody, I think it&#8217;s fair to assume that he is being held for a reason. </p>
<p>&#8220;Batman would get his facts straight, do the proper investigation, not go after anyone who wasn’t involved, certainly not target civilians, and he wouldn’t use torture on anyone that he didn’t know for certain was involved in the crime going on in Gotham City. He also leaves Metropolis alone because those criminals don’t have anything to do with the crime in Gotham.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, you certainly deflated Harry&#8217;s comparison there. Nevermind the fact that you&#8217;re being glib and even downright disingenuous when it comes to Bush&#8217;s handling of the war, as I proved above. But hey, while you&#8217;re at it, why don&#8217;t you bring up the fact that Batman doesn&#8217;t have a southern accent? And hey, isn&#8217;t Bush just a little bit older than Batman?</p>
<p>Give me a break. Harry was making a generalized comparison. Sure, if you zoom far enough in, you&#8217;re gonna find discrepancies. Hey, no allegory is perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Cole</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-10416</link>
		<author>Christopher Cole</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-10416</guid>
		<description>Stephanie, what did I say that is wrong? Where is the proof that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? Did we not indeed invade a sovereign nation based on bad evidence? Did not the government hire contract killers (Blackwater) who took out 17 unarmed civilians, and at least 14 of them had no reason to die (many of whom were women and children)? Has not the Bush administration used torture methods on persons that might not be terrorists at all?

Batman would get his facts straight, do the proper investigation, not go after anyone who wasn't involved, certainly not target civilians, and he wouldn't use torture on anyone that he didn't know for certain was involved in the crime going on in Gotham City. He also leaves Metropolis alone because those criminals don't have anything to do with the crime in Gotham.

So unless you can prove otherwise, GWB is definitely NOT Bruce Wayne/Batman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie, what did I say that is wrong? Where is the proof that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? Did we not indeed invade a sovereign nation based on bad evidence? Did not the government hire contract killers (Blackwater) who took out 17 unarmed civilians, and at least 14 of them had no reason to die (many of whom were women and children)? Has not the Bush administration used torture methods on persons that might not be terrorists at all?</p>
<p>Batman would get his facts straight, do the proper investigation, not go after anyone who wasn&#8217;t involved, certainly not target civilians, and he wouldn&#8217;t use torture on anyone that he didn&#8217;t know for certain was involved in the crime going on in Gotham City. He also leaves Metropolis alone because those criminals don&#8217;t have anything to do with the crime in Gotham.</p>
<p>So unless you can prove otherwise, GWB is definitely NOT Bruce Wayne/Batman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-10403</link>
		<author>Stephanie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-10403</guid>
		<description>JohnLocke
on 07 Jul 2008 at 5:31 pm 
30Well, I was able to enjoy “The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford” despite James Carville’s cameo. But still, it’s not exactly a positive sign to those of us trying to find a right-wing message in this film.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Here is a little bit of advice....stop trying to find the knife. There isnt one. OK? Even if Leahy is in it. Politicians, especially leftwing morons are not especially the brightest spark plugs in the V8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JohnLocke<br />
on 07 Jul 2008 at 5:31 pm<br />
30Well, I was able to enjoy “The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford” despite James Carville’s cameo. But still, it’s not exactly a positive sign to those of us trying to find a right-wing message in this film.<br />
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Here is a little bit of advice&#8230;.stop trying to find the knife. There isnt one. OK? Even if Leahy is in it. Politicians, especially leftwing morons are not especially the brightest spark plugs in the V8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-10402</link>
		<author>Stephanie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2598#comment-10402</guid>
		<description>Why would Bush be Batman? Bruce Wayne/Batman has a clear plan of attack, gets all of his facts straight before doing anything rash, is decisive, and doesn’t kill unarmed civilians nor torture merely suspected criminals/terrorists. He knows who the bad guys are, and he doesn’t get side tracked by criminals in other cities who have nothing to do with the chaos in Gotham.

So I am failing to see your connection between Bush and Batman here.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


The foolishness and ignorance of the facts on the GWOT in this statement is well breathtaking. Even if I would agree with a third of it, it is still.....wow.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Bush be Batman? Bruce Wayne/Batman has a clear plan of attack, gets all of his facts straight before doing anything rash, is decisive, and doesn’t kill unarmed civilians nor torture merely suspected criminals/terrorists. He knows who the bad guys are, and he doesn’t get side tracked by criminals in other cities who have nothing to do with the chaos in Gotham.</p>
<p>So I am failing to see your connection between Bush and Batman here.<br />
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>The foolishness and ignorance of the facts on the GWOT in this statement is well breathtaking. Even if I would agree with a third of it, it is still&#8230;..wow&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
