Breitbart: ‘Is that change Melissa Etheridge can believe in?’
Posted by Dirty Harry on Monday, September 22nd, 2008
Yikes.
Awesomeness:
Clumsy on her lesbian training wheels, Miss Lohan and Miss Cho, Miss Bernhard and Miss O’Donnell, are granted immunity for their outrageous rhetoric because they are party girls - Democrats through and through - and creatures of the media. And because of this protection racket, none will be forced to attend sensitivity training for crossing the line last week against Mrs. Palin.
It’s also why few will know that the Alaska governor vetoed legislation that would have prevented gays from getting marriagelike benefits. It’s also why the media made Republicans Mark Foley and Larry Craig the butts of jokes that would be considered homophobic if hurled at liberal Democrats.
Not since the drubbing of Clarence Thomas during his 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearings have liberals in Hollywood and the elite media so openly conspired to deny a minority the right to free thought and free expression of political ideals. Now Sarah Palin is exposing the Democratic Media Complex to a new generation, many of them open-minded women.
Filed in General |
Jack Marinoon 22 Sep 2008 at 8:08 am 1Democrats = rabid mad dogs plain and simple.
Audietooon 22 Sep 2008 at 8:26 am 2It is the willful ignorance of the average Jane Blow democrat voter that is starting to wear on my nerves. I actually had one say to me that if Sarah Pollen vetoed legislation denying gays marriage benefits if would be in the paper and on CNN.
Like Tommy Smothers said “Truth is what you make somebody believe”
StringerBon 22 Sep 2008 at 9:07 am 3Good point on MSM bias regarding who’s allowed to get bashed, but Larry Craig’s still an A-hole who deserves to have his career torched; BTW, good job from last night’s Red Eye for trashing that botoxed minger you have pictured above…
MrSideouson 22 Sep 2008 at 9:44 am 4great article. Right on target like a smart bomb. Makes the media *somewhat* safer to read again.
Full Metal Deer Platoonon 22 Sep 2008 at 10:03 am 5“lesbian training wheels”
L.O.freakin’ L!
dresbachon 22 Sep 2008 at 10:53 am 6“Truth is what you make somebody believe”
Was this Tommy Smothers? Sounds more like Joseph Goebbels; but I guess it’s getting harder to tell one facist apart from the other these days.
Dylan Brunson 22 Sep 2008 at 11:17 am 7That annoys me, Obama is against gay marriage, like many straight people. Why is he not homophobic, but Palin, who vetoed an attempt to deny gay couples state benefits, is? It is, just like Breitbart says, that they hate her because she reminds them of the cute girl they lusted after in high school.
Cambiason 22 Sep 2008 at 11:18 am 8Dylan: I think the lefties just assume Obama is lying when he says he opposes gay marriage. You know, it’s for the rubes in flyover country.
Stephanieon 22 Sep 2008 at 12:17 pm 9Again Mr. Breitbart’s got it again! Awesome stuff. Lilo is a waste of DNA. There I said it and if any of our leftist pantywaists want to have a debate about the political correctness of that statement I come with a full bag of knuckles and I am not afraid to use them.
What Breitbart is getting at is the pathological mental illness of many leftists. I remember watching a Sex and the City episode and Margeret Cho (Sandra Bernhards uglier cousin) was so bad in it I am unable to watch any scenes she is in. She is just beyond untalented.
I mean I know these people are supposed to be funny, talented dramatic actors, singers but WTF? I am beginning to think that the performing arts are just places where the other other special kids go because they can’t live in reality.
Stephanieon 22 Sep 2008 at 12:20 pm 10Again another excellent Breitbart column! Awesome.
Publius804on 22 Sep 2008 at 12:54 pm 11Excellent piece. Breitbart talks about conservatives and gay marriage in this piece, how is prop 8 doing in California Harry? Lat I heard it was losing. How are you gonna vote?
It'sOmaron 22 Sep 2008 at 2:16 pm 12Lipstick is to…pig = Botox is to…used-up ’80s relic
Buck Turgidsonon 22 Sep 2008 at 3:53 pm 13So might as well veto benefits to gay “partners.” Unless you are a Dem you don’t get “credit” for it and it’s the right thing to do anyway. Marriage was not created to grant benefits to spouses. Benefits to spouses are supposed to strengthen families. Society has no interest in promoting gay coupling. It does not bring children into the world and it is not conducive to healthy child rearing. It teaches kids that sex is nothing more than a recreational grinding of nerve endings. Sorry for my sour mood, but I am sick to death of the steady creep of relativism masquerading as tolerance. To hell with this “we’re gay friendly too” crap. Fine if gays want to do whatever they want discretely, but this in your face crap is too much, and benefits for “domestic partners” is too in your face. And no benefits for shack-ups either. That takes benefits from being a support for families to yet one more reason not to do the right thing and get married in the first place. Get some perspective and don’t be afraid to take a stand for what’s right, folks.
Vetoing a bill restricting gay partners from getting domestic benefits? Strike one against Sarah Palin.