Leftist. Blacklist. Thugocracy.
Posted by Dirty Harry on Friday, November 14th, 2008
Watch CBS Videos Online
“Blacklist” is their word, not mine. The true left reveals themselves either by participation or not speaking up.
Hat tip: Hot Air
Filed in General |
Megon 14 Nov 2008 at 9:22 pm 1I can’t believe I was against Prop 8. What a fool I was.
JohnFNWayneon 14 Nov 2008 at 9:39 pm 2Let them keep it up. Like any of this is helping their cause.
The Ugly Americanon 14 Nov 2008 at 9:44 pm 3Check out the newest cover of The Advocate.
Gay is the New Black
Gawd, how I would love to see these protesters march along Crenshaw Boulevard with this plastered to their signs.
The crowd reactions would be priceless.
Zundfolgeon 14 Nov 2008 at 9:49 pm 4Just remember, one man’s black list is another man’s white list.
antigayblacklist.com is creating a whitelist for Christians and others that oppose the direction gay rights activists would like to move the US.
I found this one interesting:
Richard Zamboni / Manufacturer, Zamboni, Co / Paramount, CA / $1,000
So are gay figure skaters going to insist on bumpy, rough ice now?
Thomas Talionison 14 Nov 2008 at 10:15 pm 5This is all about ‘words.’
We have allowed words to become misappropriated. Ex: Capitalism, Liberal, Conservative, Equality, Fairness. Now Marriage.
A is A. B is B. Listen to the philosophical aspect from this chick:
http://www.popmodal.com/video/768/Pia-Varma-An-American-Woman
Ideas matter.
Snarfblatton 14 Nov 2008 at 10:48 pm 6You know, you’ve gotta love the way Lefties have to overdo things. In 2004, whenever I would be asked where I disagreed with with the Republican platform, one of the first issues out of my mouth would be “gay marriage.” If their church wants to marry them, why not? By 2006, I was leaving the gay marriage ban blank on my ballot, because of hardline tactics (calling religious people hateful bigots, the increasing use of judicial fiat over democratic means). This year, I voted for my state’s gay marriage amendment. I was disgusted by the recent incident in New England where the guy was forced by the courts to offer up his place of business to a gay wedding party. Whatever happened to freedom of religion? I’m appalled by schools taking kids to gay weddings and teaching them about homosexuality at ridiculously young ages. Shouldn’t the parents get their say? Now, they’re applying fascist tactics against those with different views than them. They’re not really doing a great job of converting me to the cause.
Hilariously, in one of my classes the day after the election, some of my classmates were discussing the results. Instead of being happy that Obama and the Democrats won, they were whining about the marriage amendments passing. Are these people ever happy? In 2004, I was just thrilled that President Bush and his party won the White House and Congress. I certainly wasn’t nitpicking and complaining about losing Pennsylvania or pro-life amendments.
Glennon 14 Nov 2008 at 10:56 pm 7I just had a freakin’ brainstorm!
Somebody, get Newt Gingrich and Karl Rove on the phone! Wait til they hear this!
For 2012, all the GOP needs to do is nominate . . .
America’s First Gay President.
EPorvaznikon 14 Nov 2008 at 11:08 pm 8Seriously, Thomas, is posting this video your answer to everything these days? I dig it as much as the next conservative, but c’mon, man, try to mix it up a bit. Jeffers can’t be paying you that much.
Carolynon 14 Nov 2008 at 11:16 pm 9After 33 years in San Francisco, I’ve finally had enough and I’m leaving. If you people think the bullying in that video is disgusting, try enduring it 365 days a year.
I don’t know where I’ll go - but like it says in the first Harry Potter book, ‘it has to be better than what I’m leaving behind’.
Inklingon 15 Nov 2008 at 12:20 am 10Hey, Caroline, come down to L.A., land of open-mindedness and tolerance. We can go to my favorite Mexican restaurant, El Coyote, and… oh, never mind.
Inklingon 15 Nov 2008 at 12:22 am 11Okay, on this website right now, there are not one, but two ads for Sean Penn’s (literally) gay movie Milk, and an ad for Meet Gay Couples dot Com. (Meet gay couples? So I guess they’re not stopping at monogamy, after all?)
whiskeyon 15 Nov 2008 at 12:48 am 12You might want to look at my website, where I attempt to analyze this whole PC temper tantrum, and figure out what this all means about how PC works, the hierarchies, the real objective.
I agree broadly with Stanley Kurtz, who wrote that Gay Marriage was a split three ways between the few Gay Conservatives who want to emulate Straight Marriage (this is a tiny group of gays), the Radicals who hate marriage as an outmoded institution and want Gay Marriage merely as social approval of Gayness, and the Subversives who wish to redefine marriage out of existence by pushing it to gay promiscuous norms.
I think the latter is what is at stake. This year in Toronto, which has had Gay Marriage for ten years, and claims a 14% Gay population, had ONE … yes ONE Gay Marriage in 2008 so far.
JohnLockeon 15 Nov 2008 at 5:44 am 13Mr. Li said it best. This kind of stuff should only be happening in communist countries.
What really gets me about all of this is that it completely undermines one of the few silver linings I held onto following the election. A lot of us thought that Obama’s election would significantly blunt the leftist anger and hatred. But it’s just not gonna happen. Even though as of January 20th they will control the presidency and congress as well as the media and Hollywood, they will still continue to play the victim and lash out against any “fascist” power they can find. I’m still hoping that they will ease up as we really get into the Obama years (just typing that makes me shudder), but now I’m not so sure anymore.
JohnJon 15 Nov 2008 at 5:51 am 14I’m sorry, but you can’t allow the tactics to define the debate. The anti-slavery movement had its share of violent and offensive supporters too.
I’m only making the comparison to demonstrate that an idea cannot necessarily be judged by its supporters, if for no other reason than that not all who oppose the idea are perfect either. Every good idea has had bad supporters, but focusing on an idea’s supporters seems to me to be a rationalization.
Joe Weldonon 15 Nov 2008 at 5:56 am 15Brace yourselves, people.
This is only the beginning.
He hasn’t even been inaugurated yet.
Oh by the way, North Korea has decided to scrap its previous agreement with the US.
It will not allow UN inspectors to take samples of the ground near their nuclear facilities, along with other tests, in order to ensure that they’re on the level.
They also said that if we try to force them to honor the terms of the agreement they signed with us, it’s an act of war.
All hail Obama.
NavyMomon 15 Nov 2008 at 7:00 am 16Thanks for all your great work, DH, but…uh…is it really necessary to advertise gay lhook-up websites on your site? Check the left side of your home page. It’s a Google ad. My 14 year old daughter likes to read your site (with me present in the room), and I’ll have to cross it off the list if gay ads are featured. Thanks.
misterdon 15 Nov 2008 at 8:58 am 17I’m in NY, so it doesn’t much matter how I stand on Prop 8, but for what its worth, I was against it, and still am. I see no reason why I should change my opinions on account of the bullies.
I wish I could say that I didn’t see this coming. Well, maybe not this exactly. I’ve long been in favor of gay marriage, but I recognize that marriage is a social institution that means little without community support. The pro-side made a mistake by going into the courts. The only way to win this is to make the argument, and by all accounts they were persuading the populace. Within a generation, gay marriage likely would have been made law BY THE PEOPLE in a large number of states (if not all). But by getting a judge or two to force this upon the public, they forced a needless confrontation and risked turning those sympathetic, open, or just neutral to their views hostile. So yesterday, the definition of marriage in California was debatable. Today, they’ve convinced California to define marriage specifically to exclude them. Well done.
Its like offering someone ice cream. Maybe they’ll want it, maybe not. But if you try shoving it down their throat, you can be sure they’ll fight you regardless.
Jack Marinoon 15 Nov 2008 at 3:32 pm 18NavyMom I think DHP was hacked by people that are against prop 8 and since Harry is a conservative site he got hit. Knowing DH it is a temporary thing
Scuffleon 15 Nov 2008 at 4:06 pm 19No, they’re Google ads. They’re chosen automatically based on the content of the page they appear on, so if you use the word ‘gay’ enough you’ll end up with gay dating ads.
Ohio Wolverine Momon 15 Nov 2008 at 4:21 pm 20Misterd, well “said” (okay,written) and a great analogy.
I never really cared one way or another until I was told it was a “right” I was denying people—-then I started reading more about the issue and related issues.
McCain lost by a similiar margin; should those who voted forMcCain start protests outside television affiliates for being the free pro-Obama arm of the campaign? Should we extort money from their advertisers? Should be picket local businesses that donated to Obama?